Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Fr0zkaandClaude Opus 5.5 0e730cdbba wip(standalone): GPU step 5 -- far GPU work 646 -> 112 ms; hybrid whole view equal to CPU
Whole far field on the RX 7900 XTX: 112 ms total (connector rings 61 ms). Cold hybrid 2.303 s vs
all-CPU 2.314 s (within noise): the far field is no longer on the wall-clock critical path.
0 sign/topology differences vs CPU and WARP incl. 127,401 protected and 353 thin-feature cells;
repeat GPU runs identical; far survival passes on GPU meshes; CPU hashes unchanged.
Open: CPU/GPU vertex distance mean 1.15 mm but max 64.56 cm, 247 tiles over the quantisation bound.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MmSoF64BbRFmk9C3p1VsBJ
2026-10-06 13:50:07 +02:00
Fr0zkaandClaude Opus 5.5 247682a8e0 wip(standalone): GPU step 4 -- batched far generation, connector panels on GPU; far survival passes
Up to 32 tiles per deferred command list, one polled event per batch, no per-tile waits; CPU
upload/enqueue 723 -> 46 ms. GPU far meshes pass far survival (7,200 strata boundaries, 10,976
connectors, 0 missing/holes). But hybrid cold 4.36 s vs CPU 2.29 s: whole-tile GPU timestamps sum to
646 ms (0.58 ms/tile; step 3's 0.03 ms covered part of the work only), divergent per-thread shape
loops; CPU far-input export 1.6 worker-s. CPU 44/44 hashes unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MmSoF64BbRFmk9C3p1VsBJ
2026-10-06 11:01:03 +02:00
Fr0zkaandClaude Opus 5.5 782f195bdb wip(standalone): GPU step 3 -- GPU decides far rock/air, sparse CPU exceptions, hybrid viewer (H)
1,114 of 1,266 far tiles meshed on the GPU; vs CPU and vs WARP: 0 sign/topology differences,
including the protected/thin exception audit; max symmetric vertex distance 0.125 cm; repeat RX runs
identical; GPU field+mesh 0.029 ms/tile average. Strata survival 7,200/7,200, but connector survival
fails (GPU lacks the connector repair panels). Hybrid cold clipmap 5.74 s vs CPU 2.23 s: dispatch and
readback overhead, not compute (~33 ms of GPU work in total).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MmSoF64BbRFmk9C3p1VsBJ
2026-10-06 09:14:22 +02:00
Fr0zkaandClaude Opus 5.5 b61ccff549 wip(standalone): GPU field step 2 -- far-field shapes/strata/relief in shared C++/HLSL, GPU field+mesh
Seven LOD2-8 tiles: RX 7900 XTX field+meshing 0.335 ms vs CPU generateTile 15.81 ms; repeat runs
bit-identical; CPU W1/W8 44/44 hashes unchanged. Not yet a real gain: rock/air signs still come from
CPU masks for every sample. Viewer does not draw GPU tiles yet; no whole-view timing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MmSoF64BbRFmk9C3p1VsBJ
2026-10-06 08:02:02 +02:00
Fr0zkaandClaude Opus 5.5 d4b4377d30 research(standalone): GPU first port -- marching cubes in D3D11 compute, exact vs WARP; field still CPU
- Compute shaders classify cells from CPU sign bits, scan output offsets, emit vertex/index buffers
  and indirect-draw args. Two 32^3 tiles: 0 topology differences hardware vs WARP; two runs on the
  RX 7900 XTX identical; max CPU/GPU vertex distance 0.000122 cm (LOD0), 0.000244 cm (LOD1).
- GPU kernels 0.049 / 0.071 ms vs CPU tile 2.33 / 1.99 ms, but CPU input preparation dominates
  (7.25 / 2.84 ms wall): no whole-view gain until the field itself runs on the GPU.
- VoxelForgeFieldShared.h: first shared C++/HLSL field math (integer noise hash, ...).
CPU path unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MmSoF64BbRFmk9C3p1VsBJ
2026-10-06 06:44:43 +02:00