# OPSTACK — progress log

> **APPEND ONLY. Never rewrite or reorder entries.** Write the entry for a piece of work *before*
> starting it, so an abrupt session end still leaves an accurate marker.
>
> **Entry format:** date · what · believed-true · **UNVERIFIED** (everything not yet built by Jahni) ·
> next single action.
>
> This file is how a fresh context resumes. Read the last entry first, then `OPSTACK-PLAN.md §9`.

---

## 2026-07-27 — branch created, design locked, nothing built

**What:** Branch `experimental` created from `69fa73e tmp` and checked out. `main` untouched and is the
known-good fallback world. Design finalised across `OPSTACK-PLAN.md` (incl. §2.5 op taxonomy and §2.6
acceptance bar, both added after Jahni's objection that a naive "ops" reading would just be his old
room-operations system). Kickoff prompt written to `OPSTACK-PROMPT.md`.

**Believed true:** the plugin builds and runs correctly as of this commit — everything through F20
phases 1+2 is built and working (confirmed by Jahni 2026-07-26; the "PENDING BUILD" markers still in
`fable-idea.md` / `ARCHITECTURE.md` are stale and are queue item Q3). `bEnableDensityVolume` is already
set to false. Lighting is deprecated for now. Live direction before this refactor was 3D density
generation (overhangs, caves inside mountains).

**UNVERIFIED:** nothing yet — no code has been written for this refactor.

**Known open bugs, not yet fixed, documented in `AUDIT-2026-07.md §1`:** C1 large-seed noise collapse ·
C2 three cache keys missing `LayoutVersion` · C3 `FMath::PerlinNoise2D` on the SDF hot path (dormant) ·
C4 `GetPlayerPosition` zero-vector sentinel · C5 unbounded-join-on-shutdown · C6 diff-layer scaling.

**Next single action:** Phase 0.5 — the three automation tests (density purity across worker threads,
`ClassifyTile` vs brute force, `DiffLayer` under contention). Then the Phase 1 skeleton header only.
Then STOP for a build. See `OPSTACK-PROMPT.md` → `WHAT TO DO`.

---

## 2026-07-27 — Q4 done: the design docs are in git

**What:** `.gitignore` replaced the single `!CODEMAP.md` exception with `!*.md`, and committed
`ARCHITECTURE.md`, `AUDIT-2026-07.md`, `CLAUDE.md`, `OPSTACK-PLAN.md`, `OPSTACK-PROGRESS.md`,
`OPSTACK-PROMPT.md`, `REVIEW_FINDINGS.md`, `fable-idea.md` (commit `3128852`). `CODEMAP.md.bak` stays
ignored (`.bak` doesn't match `*.md`).

**Why first, out of queue order:** every `*.md` was ignored, so a `git commit` of this progress file
would have silently recorded nothing. The whole unattended crash-safety discipline depends on this
file being committable, so it had to lead.

**Believed true / verified:** verified — `git ls-files "*.md"` now lists all nine.

**UNVERIFIED:** nothing (no C++ touched).

**Next single action:** Phase 0.5 tests + the Phase 1 skeleton header.

---

## 2026-07-27 — starting Phase 0.5 (tests) + Phase 1 skeleton header

**Plan for this batch, written before doing it** (so an abrupt end leaves a marker):

1. `Source/VoxelForge/Private/Tests/VoxelForgeDeterminismTest.cpp` — density purity, shuffled order,
   multi-threaded (`ParallelFor`), bit-equality.
2. `Source/VoxelForge/Private/Tests/VoxelForgeClassifyTileTest.cpp` — `ClassifyTile` verdict vs a
   brute-force sweep of the exact mesher lattice.
3. `Source/VoxelForge/Private/Tests/VoxelForgeDiffLayerTest.cpp` — N readers + 1 writer, monotonic
   version, no crash.
4. `Public/VoxelDensityOp.h` — the Phase 1 contract. HEADER ONLY, nothing wired into `GetDensityAt`.

**Known design constraint found while reading:** `ClassifyTile` and `GetDensityAt`'s per-chunk caches
need a live `UVoxelStrateManager`, whose only entry point is
`Initialize(UVoxelSettings*, int32)` reading `TSoftObjectPtr` pools. Tests therefore build transient
`UVoxelStrateDefinition` objects and point soft pointers at them. **If that resolve turns out not to
work headless, test 2 self-skips rather than failing** — noted here because a skip that looks like a
pass is exactly the kind of thing that hides a bug.

**UNVERIFIED:** everything below this line until Jahni builds. No test has ever been compiled in this
plugin — `Private/Tests/` is a new directory and the module has never pulled in `AutomationTest.h`.

**Next single action:** write the three test files.

---

## 2026-07-27 — batch A+B landed, BUILD GATE reached

**Commits, oldest first:**

| Commit | What | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| `3128852` | `.gitignore !*.md` + the eight design docs into git (Q4) | none |
| `6eec796` | the three Phase 0.5 tests + `VoxelForgeTestFixture.h` | new files only |
| `d41d34e` | `Public/VoxelDensityOp.h` + `EVoxelTileClass` moved to `VoxelTypes.h` | header-only |
| `73f6b26` | **AUDIT C2 fix** — five caches now key on `GetLayoutVersion()` | ⚠️ the only commit that touches a hot path |
| `b4d13e0` | regression test for C2 | new file only |

**Believed true:** `73f6b26` is behaviour-neutral at a static layout — the layout version only
moves on `Initialize`, so a running world sees the same keys it saw before, plus one `uint32`
compare per chunk-change. It changes behaviour only after a `RebuildStrates` / editor live edit,
which is the bug.

**Design decision worth not re-litigating:** `ClassifyBox` in `VoxelDensityOp.h` is deliberately
NOT source-only. `ApplyBoundarySeal` does `Max(D, SealFactor·BaseDensity)` inside its band — it
*forces* solid regardless of input, and pure direction (`FillOnly`) cannot express that. Over a box
sitting entirely in the top seal band the source says AllAir, `FillOnly` kills AllAir, both
hypotheses die → Mixed, whereas `ClassifyTile` returns AllSolid there today. Not a hole, but a
silent loss of exactly the trivial tiles T1.d exists to skip. So forcing ops reset the fold, and
ops after them still apply. The full mapping from the fold to today's `ClassifyTile` is written out
in the header.

**Deliberately NOT done, and why:** AUDIT **C1** (unbounded `SeedF`) is a one-line fix at six
sites, and `OPSTACK-PLAN §8` lists it first. I left it. It is dormant at small seeds, and applying
it changes `SeedF` from `Seed` to `hash(Seed)&0x3FFF` — i.e. it re-rolls the whole world's noise
even at today's seed, forcing a re-tune. Doing that in the same build Jahni is using to judge four
other unverified changes costs him attribution for no present-day benefit. It should land on its
own, deliberately, when he has an hour to re-tune. **It is still a real bug — do not lose it.**

**UNVERIFIED — everything above.** None of it has been compiled. In particular the test fixture's
`TSoftObjectPtr` → transient-object resolve has never run.

**Next single action:** build-free queue. Q1 (`OPSTACK-DECOMPOSITION.md`), then Q2, then Q3.

---

## 2026-07-27 — build-free queue done. END OF UNATTENDED SESSION.

**What (queue items, all zero-build-risk):**

- **Q1 — `OPSTACK-DECOMPOSITION.md`** (commit `c188ee8`). All 8 archetypes read line by line and
  broken into source / combiners / modifiers / structural post, with every `FStrateGenerationParams`
  field traced to its destination op. Three findings that change sequencing are in its §0.
- **Q2 — the param audit** is §9 of that same file. Every field is claimed except
  `WaterLevelRelative`, which is a render/water property misfiled in the density struct (and `Lerp`'d
  across strate boundaries, where a water plane arguably shouldn't be). Reported, not deleted.
- **Q3 — stale markers ticked** (commit `831ee2f`): `fable-idea` F20 phases 1/2 + F18,
  `REVIEW_FINDINGS` perf pass 2 + batch 3, `ARCHITECTURE`'s biome full-param redesign. NOT ticked:
  `ARCHITECTURE`'s F6 master material graph — its C++ half is built but the graph is editor-side
  work that is genuinely still open.
- **Q4 — `.gitignore`** (commit `3128852`, done first out of order because progress-log commits
  depended on it).
- CODEMAP §3 rows for every new/moved symbol; `OPSTACK-PLAN` phase markers ticked.

**The three findings, so they are not lost if only this file is read:**

1. **The op contract probably needs an SDF channel as well as a density channel.** Rooms, pits and
   chimneys are `SmoothMin`'d in SDF space before a *single* carve, and three of the four SDF
   archetypes add roughness to the SDF, not to density. A single-channel `Eval` can only overwrite —
   which is also why cross-source `SmoothUnion` (*"a maze inside a mountain that looks like it
   belongs"*) is not expressible without it. **Decide before porting Maze**; it is far cheaper now
   than after four ports. Not applied — it is Jahni's call.
2. **Worm tunnels are why TunnelNetwork can never skip a tile.** A fielded 3D-noise carve with no
   bounds forces `CarveOnly` everywhere, killing `AllSolid` for the most-used archetype. Its
   amplitude is trivially capped by `WormStrength`, so ~10 lines of scalar bound recovers deep-rock
   skipping. Suggests one numeric bound belongs in Phase 2, not Phase 3 as the plan has it.
3. **Disturbances already carry lattice bounds `ClassifyTile` discards** (it only tests
   `ChasmDensity > 0` strate-wide). A win available to SurfaceWorld independently of everything else.

**Believed true:** the working tree is a coherent, committed state. Nine commits on `experimental`,
`main` untouched.

**UNVERIFIED — the whole C++ batch.** Nothing has been compiled. Specifically at risk:
`Private/Tests/` is a new directory, the module has never included `AutomationTest.h`, and the test
fixture's `TSoftObjectPtr` → transient-`UVoxelStrateDefinition` resolve has never run.

**Next single action: BUILD.** Then fix what the tests say, then answer
`OPSTACK-DECOMPOSITION.md §11`, then port Maze. Do not write more plugin C++ before the build.

---

## 2026-07-27 — correction to the 3rd entry above

The entry *"starting Phase 0.5"* says the `ClassifyTile` test **self-skips** if the fixture's
`TSoftObjectPtr` resolve fails headless. That was the plan; it is **not** what was written. All four
tests call `AddError(World.WhyInvalid())` and FAIL, with a message that says explicitly it is a
fixture failure and not a density bug. Failing is the right behaviour — a skip that reads as a pass
is exactly what hides bugs — but the earlier entry describes code that does not exist, so it is
corrected here rather than edited (this log is append-only).

---

## 2026-07-27 — starting Phase 1: the Maze port, OFF the hot path

**Jahni said continue and build later, delegating the open design calls. Two decided, with reasons:**

**(1) `Eval` becomes two-channel** — `FVoxelOpSample { Density, Sdf }` — per
`OPSTACK-DECOMPOSITION.md §0.1`. Maze itself forces the question: its roughness perturbs the **SDF**
(`MazeSDF += noise·Rough`), not the density. Applied to density instead, the same noise scales with
the local gradient and is a visibly different effect. Single-channel could not port Maze faithfully,
never mind compose two sources with `SmoothMin` later. Cost: one float.

**(2) The stack's density channel is INTERNAL convention (positive = SOLID), negated once by the
caller.** This **reverses what `VoxelDensityOp.h` said yesterday** (it specified MC). Reason: every
existing archetype body is written in internal convention and negates on `return`. Porting in MC
would mean flipping the sign of every line at transcription time — on the plugin's documented #1
source of confusion. Internal makes each port a literal transcription instead. `ApplyDisturbances`
and the diff layer genuinely are MC-space, but they live in `GetDensityAt` *after* the archetype
today and are NOT in this stack, so the question is deferred, not dodged.

**The shape of this batch, and why it is not "unverified code on unverified code":** the ops, the
stack and the Maze port are **all new files**, plus one mechanical extraction. **`GetDensityAt` and
`ClassifyTile` are NOT touched** — nothing in the running game can change. The port is validated by
a test that runs the op stack against `GetMazeDensity` over thousands of points and asserts
bit-equality, so Phase 1's real question ("does the source/modifier split fall out naturally?") gets
an empirical answer instead of an opinion. Wiring the stack into `GetDensityAt` waits for the build.

**Files:** `Public/VoxelDensityPrimitives.h` (spine/seal/passage lifted out of `VoxelGenerator.cpp`
so ops and the generator share ONE copy) · `Public/VoxelDensityOpStack.h` +
`Private/VoxelDensityOpStack.cpp` · `Private/Tests/VoxelForgeOpStackMazeTest.cpp` ·
edits to `VoxelDensityOp.h` and `VoxelGenerator.cpp` (include the primitives, delete the local copies).

**UNVERIFIED:** all of it, plus everything from the previous batch.

**Next single action:** write those files, then STOP.

---

## 2026-07-27 — Phase 1 done (written, not built). Maze DOES decompose.

**The Phase 1 question is answered.** `OPSTACK-PLAN §4`'s stop-trigger asked whether the
source/modifier split falls out naturally from the existing code. It does — Maze becomes seven ops
with no contortion, and three of them are already shared with other archetypes:

```
FConstantRockSource      ← also TunnelNetwork's and VerticalShafts' first line
FLatticeCorridorSource   ← Maze only (role 1: what makes a maze a maze)
FSdfRoughnessMod         ← also VerticalShafts, FloatingIslands
FSdfCarveOp              ← the same six lines currently copied in three archetypes
FOriginSpineOp ─┐
FBoundarySealOp ├─ identical in all six density functions
FPassageCarveOp ┘
```

No revert, no stop-trigger. Commit `4c53d3b`.

**What is deliberately NOT wired:** `GetDensityAt` and `ClassifyTile` are untouched, so nothing in a
running world can change. `OPSTACK-PLAN §4` Phase 1 step 3 ("GetDensityAt gains one branch") is
**held back until the build is green** — wiring an uncompiled stack into the hot path would be
exactly the stacked-unverified-work pattern `AUDIT §P3` documents. The port is validated instead by
`VoxelForge.OpStack.MazeEquivalence`.

**Two contract decisions taken (Jahni delegated them):** two-channel `Eval`, and INTERNAL sign
convention inside the stack. Both are argued in the previous entry and in the commit message. The
second **reverses** what `VoxelDensityOp.h` said on 2026-07-26 — if a later context finds MC-in-stack
written anywhere, that text is stale.

**One pre-existing hairline bug found and NOT silently patched:** at the inner edge of a seal band,
`1 - Dist/Thickness` can round to exactly `0.0f`, so `SealFactor·BaseDensity` is 0, internal density
lands on 0, and the mesher's `D >= IsoLevel` counts that point as AIR. Today's `ClassifyTile`
excludes those z from column testing and can therefore emit `AllSolid` over them. It needs the
archetype to produce air at exactly that z, so the window is hairline — but a false `AllSolid` is a
hole. The **new** seal op keeps a 1-voxel safety margin before it forces. The old path is untouched;
`VoxelForge.Determinism.ClassifyTileSoundness` would catch it if it ever fires.

**UNVERIFIED:** everything, still. Nothing has been compiled.

**Next single action: BUILD.** Then, in order: fix what the tests report → read
`MazeEquivalence`'s two numbers (how many samples differ, and how many tiles the stack can prove
uniform) → only then wire the stack into `GetDensityAt` behind a per-strate opt-in.

---

## 2026-07-27 — FIRST GREEN BUILD. Six tests ran. Five passed.

**The plugin compiles and the tests execute.** Results
(`VoxelM/Saved/Automation/Automation2026.07.27-02.36.57.csv`):

| Test | Result | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| `ClassifyTileSoundness` | ✅ | 600 tiles: 471 Mixed, 76 AllSolid, 53 AllAir. 24 brute-forced against the exact mesher lattice, **zero holes**. T1.d's soundness is machine-checked for the first time. |
| `DensityPurity` | ✅ | 10k points, shuffled order, multi-threaded, with and without carves — **bit-identical throughout**. No cache-key bug of the AUDIT C2 family survives in the density path. |
| `LiveEditInvalidation` | ✅ | 64/64 probes moved after a live edit. The C2 fix works. |
| `BoxVerdictFold` | ✅ | The op-stack fold's logic, case by case. |
| `MazeEquivalence` | ✅ (with warning) | see below |
| `DiffLayerContention` | ❌ | **my test was wrong, not the plugin** — see below |

### The two numbers that mattered

**454 of 20000 Maze samples differ, largest |delta| 1.907e-06, and ZERO land on the opposite side
of the isosurface.** 1.907e-06 is exactly one ULP at a float of magnitude 16 — i.e. the ports are
*geometrically identical*: not one triangle would move. §2.6 accepts this. Leading hypothesis for
the residue, now fixed and awaiting a re-run: the original routes the noise coordinates through an
`FVector` (double in UE5) before casting back to float, so it rounds float→double→float, while the
op passed floats straight through. Under `/fp:fast` those round in different places. The op now
reproduces the detour deliberately, with a comment saying not to "simplify" it. **If the next run
still shows drift, the next candidate is FMA contraction differing across translation units.**

**23 of 60 Maze tiles proved uniform.** Today's `ClassifyTile` proves **zero** for Maze — every cave
archetype falls through to `"pas prouvable en v1"`. That is ~38% of tiles becoming skippable for an
archetype that has never skipped one, and it is the first hard evidence for the perf half of the
whole refactor.

### The failure was mine

`Expected 'every carve was recorded' to be 400, but it was 3200.` `GetTotalModificationCount()` sums
**stored entries**, not operations — a stroke is filed under every chunk its AABB overlaps, and 400
radius-6 spheres straddling chunk corners store 8 entries each. The concurrency the test actually
exists to check all passed: **7 reader threads, 28.7 million read rounds against 760 writes and 6
`Clear()`s, no crash, monotonic version, clean state afterwards.** Assertion rewritten to compare
the stored count against the fan-out `ApplyModification` itself reported, which is a stronger check.

Worth noting for AUDIT C6: that getter is the right metric for the diff-layer scaling wall (stored
entries are what grow without bound) and the wrong name for it.

**UNVERIFIED:** the three fixes in this entry (the diff-layer assertion, the `FVector` rounding
detour, and the `FVoxelOpStack` move-only/dllexport fix that made the build pass) have not been
re-run.

**Next single action:** rebuild, re-run, and check whether `MazeEquivalence` now reports 0 differing
samples. Then wire the stack into `GetDensityAt` behind a per-strate opt-in — Phase 1 step 3, which
was deliberately held back until the build went green. It now has.

---

## 2026-07-27 (afternoon) — ALL SIX TESTS GREEN. One hypothesis killed.

Run at 12:02 today (in `Saved/Logs/VoxelM.log`; the CSV export was taken later).

| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| `ClassifyTileSoundness` | ✅ |
| `DensityPurity` | ✅ |
| `DiffLayerContention` | ✅ **now passes** — the assertion fix was right; 33.3M read rounds |
| `LiveEditInvalidation` | ✅ 64/64 probes moved |
| `BoxVerdictFold` | ✅ |
| `MazeEquivalence` | ✅ (same warning) |

**Phase 0.5's gate is met.** All three original tests plus the two op-stack ones are green on the
current code, so the op stack is no longer being built on unverified ground.

### The `FVector` rounding hypothesis was WRONG — and the way it was wrong is informative

The previous entry predicted the fix would take `MazeEquivalence` from 454 differing samples to 0.
The re-run returned **exactly 454 samples, exactly `1.90734863e-06`, at exactly `(-23, 55, -660)`** —
bit-for-bit the same result. The `float → double → float` detour is a no-op, which is what
`/fp:precise` semantics say it should be. Hypothesis eliminated cleanly; the detour is harmless and
stays (it costs nothing and documents the original's shape), but it is **not** the cause.

**Stopped guessing, added a bisect** to `MazeEquivalence`: it re-runs the comparison four times,
disabling roughness → seal → spine → passages, on **both sides**, and reports which stage's removal
makes it bit-exact. One run now answers a question two guesses failed to.

**Standing hypothesis, to be confirmed or killed by that bisect:** the residue is compiler
float-contraction across translation units (`/fp:fast` lets the same expression reassociate
differently in `VoxelGenerator.cpp` and `VoxelDensityOpStack.cpp`), worth ~1 ULP. It fits the
~2% hit rate: **only voxels inside the narrow SDF blend shell have an unsaturated carve factor** —
everywhere else `Carve` is exactly 0 or exactly 1 and both paths agree bit for bit. If that is
confirmed, **bit-identity is not achievable in principle for these ports**, and the standard for
every later archetype becomes "zero isosurface crossings", not "zero differing floats". That is a
conclusion worth having explicitly rather than re-deriving per port.

**UNVERIFIED:** the bisect itself.

**Next single action:** re-run `MazeEquivalence` and read the bisect table. Then Phase 1 step 3 —
wire the stack into `GetDensityAt` behind a per-strate opt-in.

---

## 2026-07-27 (afternoon) — the residue is the COMPILER. Measured, not guessed.

**Bisect result:**

```
roughness off                  ->  151 / 5000 differ (max |delta| 1.907e-06)
roughness + seal off           ->  155 / 5000 differ (max |delta| 9.537e-07)
roughness + seal + spine off   ->  126 / 5000 differ (max |delta| 9.537e-07)
corridors + carve ONLY         ->  126 / 5000 differ (max |delta| 9.537e-07)
```

The residue survives every stage removal, down to **constant rock + capsule SDF + carve** — code
that is a character-for-character transcription. So it is not in anything the decomposition added.

**Cause, from the engine source rather than from memory** (`VCToolChain.cs`):

```csharp
case FPSemanticsMode.Default: // Default is imprecise FP semantics.
case FPSemanticsMode.Imprecise: Arguments.Add("/fp:fast"); break;
```

UBT's own doc for that mode: *"FP math isn't IEEE-754 compliant: the compiler is allowed to transform
math expressions in ways that might result in differently rounded results."* The plugin sets no
override, so identical source in `VoxelGenerator.cpp` and `VoxelDensityOpStack.cpp` may legitimately
reassociate differently — worth about 1 ULP.

Two prior hypotheses were wrong (the `FVector` round-trip, then "check the roughness window / carve
blend"). The bisect cost one build and settled it. **Noted as a working lesson: on a numeric
discrepancy, bisect before hypothesising a third time.**

**Why exactly ~2.3% of samples:** `Blend - Sdf` catastrophically cancels at the edge of the blend
shell, amplifying a 1-ULP SDF difference into a 1-ULP density difference. Outside that thin shell
`Carve` is exactly 0 or exactly 1 and both paths agree bit for bit.

### Consequences recorded

1. **`OPSTACK-PLAN §2.6`** — bit-identity is not achievable in principle for these ports, at any
   level of care. The operational bar for every remaining archetype, now encoded in the test:
   **hard-fail on isosurface crossings · tolerate ULP-scale deltas · warn on anything larger**
   (that last one is real port drift, and the test no longer cries wolf about the floor).
2. **`AUDIT-2026-07.md §C9` (new)** — the part that matters more than the port: `ARCHITECTURE §9.1`'s
   multiplayer model is "replicate the seed, every peer regenerates identically", and under
   `/fp:fast` that holds **only between bit-identical binaries**. Same build, same platform: fine
   (`DensityPurity` proves it). Windows client + Linux dedicated server both regenerating
   authoritative geometry: a real desync source, presenting as rare unreproducible geometry-only
   divergence. The knob is `FPSemantics = FPSemanticsMode.Precise` in `VoxelForge.Build.cs`, and
   **it should not be turned speculatively** — it blocks the vectorisation T2.a was chasing, on the
   plugin's hot loop, for an unmeasured cost. Decision needs a profile and a confirmed
   cross-platform requirement.

**UNVERIFIED:** the test's new ULP-tolerance branch (expect `MazeEquivalence` to report the same 454
samples as INFO rather than WARNING next run).

**Next single action:** Phase 1 step 3 — wire the stack into `GetDensityAt` behind a per-strate
opt-in. Phase 1's question is fully answered: Maze decomposes cleanly, the stack is
window-invariant, and it proves 23/60 tiles uniform where `ClassifyTile` proves zero.

---

## 2026-07-27 — /fp:fast hypothesis DEAD. Third wrong guess. Switching to instrumentation.

**Jahni built with `FPSemantics = FPSemanticsMode.Precise` and got a BYTE-IDENTICAL result:** same
454 samples, same `1.90734863e-06`, same `(-23, 55, -660)`. A different float model producing
identical output is not "the same rounding error twice" — it is proof that **rounding is not the
cause at all.** The residue is a real, deterministic LOGIC difference somewhere in a transcription I
have read three times and believe to be identical.

**Track record on this one discrepancy, recorded because the pattern matters more than the bug:**

| # | Hypothesis | Killed by |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | `FVector` float→double→float round-trip | re-run returned the identical result |
| 2 | "check the roughness window / carve blend / octave count" | the bisect: residue survives to `corridors + carve ONLY` |
| 3 | `/fp:fast` cross-TU reassociation | `/fp:precise` build returned the identical result |

Three hypotheses, all plausible, all reasoned from *what could explain it* rather than from
measurement. Each cost a build cycle. **The lesson is not "be smarter", it is "instrument earlier":**
the bisect (measurement) produced more information in one run than two hypotheses did in three.

**Corrected in the docs:** `AUDIT-2026-07.md §C9` and `OPSTACK-PLAN §2.6` both assert the `/fp:fast`
story as the explanation for the residue. **That specific claim is now falsified and must be walked
back** — see the next entry. (The *separate* C9 finding, that UBT's FP default differs by toolchain
and the MP model assumes bit-reproducible terrain, still stands on its own: it was read out of
`VCToolChain.cs` / `ClangToolChain.cs`, not inferred from this test.)

**What changed in code:** `FVoxelOpStack::EvalSample` now exposes the full `FVoxelOpSample`, and
`MazeEquivalence` dumps the worst point in raw hex — both densities, the stack's internal SDF, and
the carve factor reconstructed from each side. That last one localises the divergence: identical
recovered carve with differing density ⇒ the fault is after the conversion; differing carve ⇒ it is
in the SDF (lattice edges or `VoxelSDF::Capsule`) or in `SmoothStep01`.

**UNVERIFIED:** the instrumentation itself.

**Next single action:** re-run `MazeEquivalence` and read the WORST-POINT DUMP. Phase 1 step 3
(wiring the stack into `GetDensityAt`) is deliberately **paused** until this is understood — it is a
small unexplained numeric difference, and those do not get smaller when you build on them.

---

## 2026-07-27 — CORRECTION: hypothesis 3 was never tested. My error, not Jahni's.

**`FPSemantics = FPSemanticsMode.Precise` was set in `Source/VoxelM/VoxelM.Build.cs` — the GAME
module.** `FPSemantics` is a `ModuleRules` property, i.e. **per module**. Every line of density code
lives in the `VoxelForge` module, which was still compiling `/fp:fast`. The float model never
changed for the code under test.

**So the previous entry is wrong and is retracted:** `/fp:fast` is NOT eliminated. The run that
"reproduced the residue under precise semantics" reproduced it under *fast* semantics, which is
exactly what it should have done and proves nothing.

**The failure mode, stated plainly because it is the third time in one day:** I accepted "it's with
fpsemantics precise" as fact and reasoned a confident conclusion from it — one paragraph after
writing that the lesson was to instrument rather than assume. The check took one `grep` and I did it
only after Jahni suggested it. **Verify the premise before reasoning from it, especially when the
premise is what makes the conclusion interesting.**

**Consequently:** the notes in the previous entry saying `AUDIT §C9` and `OPSTACK-PLAN §2.6` are
falsified are themselves withdrawn. Those documents' `/fp:fast` explanation is back to *plausible
and now genuinely about to be tested*. Nothing in them needs changing yet.

**What changed:** `FPSemantics = FPSemanticsMode.Precise` added to **`VoxelForge.Build.cs`**, clearly
marked as a temporary experiment with removal instructions and a read-the-result guide.

`VoxelM.Build.cs` can keep or drop its copy — it is harmless either way and irrelevant to this test.

**One build now answers everything**, because the WORST-POINT DUMP instrumentation is already in:

| Result | Meaning | Next |
|---|---|---|
| 454 → **0** | the FP model WAS the cause | remove the line; decide separately whether precise is worth its cost on the hot path (needs a profile) |
| 454 → **454** | real logic difference | remove the line; read the dump — identical recovered carve ⇒ fault after the conversion, differing carve ⇒ fault in the SDF or `SmoothStep01` |

**UNVERIFIED:** everything about this experiment.

**Next single action:** rebuild, re-run `MazeEquivalence`, read the two numbers. Phase 1 step 3 stays
paused.

---

## 2026-07-27 — FPSemantics on VoxelForge does not build. Reverted; measuring a safer way.

**What happened:** setting `FPSemantics` on the VoxelForge module broke the build with ~30 errors —
`UMaterialInterface`, `USoundBase`, `TSubclassOf<AActor>`, `APawn`, `ENABLE_DRAW_DEBUG` all
"undefined type". **None of them are FP-related.**

**Why:** UBT can only share a precompiled header between modules whose **compile environments
match**. Changing `FPSemantics` changed VoxelForge's environment, so it lost eligibility for the
engine's shared PCH — and with it ~30 includes the plugin has always been getting for free.

**Genuine latent finding, worth its own item some day:** several public headers use engine types they
never include (`VoxelBiomeDefinition.h`, `VoxelStrateDefinition.h`, `VoxelSettings.h`,
`VoxelStrateTypes.h`, `VoxelContentManager.h`, `VoxelDensityVolume.h`, and `VoxelWorld.cpp`). The
plugin compiles today only because the shared PCH supplies them. UE has been moving away from
implicit shared-PCH includes for years, so this will need doing eventually — **but not inside an
unrelated diagnostic**, which is why it was reverted rather than chased.

**Reverted**, with the reason written into `VoxelForge.Build.cs` so nobody retries it blind.

### The FP question, answered without touching build settings

`MazeEquivalence` now compiles a **verbatim copy of the Maze core into the TEST's translation unit**
and compares three implementations of the same source:

```
A = GetMazeDensity        (VoxelGenerator.cpp TU)
B = the operator stack    (VoxelDensityOpStack.cpp TU)
C = MazeCoreVerbatim      (the test's own TU)
```

- **A != C** ⇒ identical source, different TU, different result ⇒ the compiler, not the port.
  Nothing to fix; record it and move on.
- **A == C, B != C** ⇒ the source IS stable across TUs ⇒ the operator stack differs for a **logic**
  reason, and it is in `FLatticeCorridorSource` or `FSdfCarveOp`.

Duplicating code is normally a fault; here it is the only instrument that answers the question,
because three careful readings all concluded "identical" and the test disagrees. It is marked
diagnostic-only and comes out once the answer is in.

**UNVERIFIED:** everything in this entry.

**Next single action:** rebuild (normal incremental now — the Build.cs change is reverted) and read
the THREE-WAY block. Phase 1 step 3 still paused.

---

## 2026-07-27 — THREE-WAY VERDICT: the fault is MINE, in the operator stack.

```
A generator TU  vs  B opstack TU : 126 differ
A generator TU  vs  C test TU    : 0 differ      <-- identical source, different TU, SAME result
B opstack TU    vs  C test TU    : 126 differ
```

**A == C settles it: the source is stable across translation units.** So the compiler was never the
cause, and the operator stack differs for a **logic** reason. Fourth hypothesis dead — but this one
points at code I own, which is the first time the answer has been actionable.

**Correction to walk back in the docs** (not yet done — do it once the cause is known, so it is
corrected with the right explanation rather than twice):
- `OPSTACK-PLAN §2.6`'s green note claims bit-identity is unachievable because of `/fp:fast`.
  **False.** `A == C` proves identical source reproduces exactly across TUs here.
- `AUDIT-2026-07.md §C9`'s *first* consequence ("refactors cannot be bit-identical") is likewise
  false and must go. **C9's second half stands** — UBT's FP default genuinely differs by toolchain,
  read straight out of `VCToolChain.cs` / `ClangToolChain.cs`, and the MP model does assume
  bit-reproducible terrain. That half was never inferred from this test.
- The test's own INFO text ("this is the expected floor... /fp:fast") is wrong for the same reason
  and gets rewritten with the real cause.

**Also learned, and worth keeping:** setting `FPSemantics` on VoxelForge costs the module the
engine's shared PCH and exposes ~30 missing includes across seven files. Recorded in `Build.cs`.

### Where the fault is NOT

Read line by line against the verbatim copy, all identical: the ctor's `FMath::Max` clamps, the
cell `FloorToInt`, `NodeCenter`, `EdgeOpen`'s hashes and salts, the `{-1,0}³` sweep and its add
order, the capsule loop, the `FMath::Min` fold, the carve's clamp/smoothstep/subtract, and the four
structural-post no-ops. Three readings said "identical" and the measurement disagrees, so **reading
is not going to find it** — hence more instrument, less staring.

### The instrument now in place

`MazeCoreVerbatim` optionally returns its **SDF** and edge count, and the three-way compares the SDF
channels directly instead of inferring from densities:

- **SDF identical, density differs** ⇒ fault is in `FSdfCarveOp`.
- **SDF differs** ⇒ fault is in `FLatticeCorridorSource` (edge set or capsule fold).

It also reports the split across all 126 mismatches, and dumps the first one with raw hex plus the
verbatim edge count — so if the edge SETS differ (a cache-key bug) that shows up as a count mismatch
immediately.

**UNVERIFIED:** the instrumentation.

**Next single action:** rebuild, read `FIRST B-vs-C MISMATCH`. It names the file to open.

---

## 2026-07-27 — LOCALISED to the carve. Testing the right variable this time.

**The diagnostic pinned it exactly:**

```
SDF   stack -1.76393199 [0xBFE1C886]   verbatim -1.76393199 [0xBFE1C886]   IDENTICAL
MC    stack  7.83939362 [0x40FADC50]   verbatim  7.83939266 [0x40FADC4E]   2 ULP apart
across all mismatches: SDF differs 0, SDF identical but density differs 126
```

So the lattice, the hashes, the edge set and `VoxelSDF::Capsule` are all **exactly right** — 126 of
126. The entire difference is in `FSdfCarveOp`, whose expression is character-identical to the
original and whose inputs (`Sdf`, `Blend` 2.0, `BaseDensity` 8) are bit-identical.

**Identical inputs + identical expression + different output ⇒ the arithmetic is being *evaluated*
differently.** And `SmoothStep01` is `x * x * (3.0f - 2.0f * x)` — `3.0f - 2.0f*x` is exactly the
shape MSVC fuses into an FMA, which is one rounding instead of two: **~1 ULP.**

**Why the three-way missed it — worth recording, because it is a reasoning error, not a coding one.**
`A` (GetMazeDensity) and `C` (the verbatim copy) are both straight-line, inlined code. `B` goes
through a **virtual** `IVoxelDensityOp` call, so `FSdfCarveOp::Eval` is compiled out-of-line and can
get a different contraction decision. The three-way tested *"does the translation-unit boundary
change the result?"* — it does not — but the real variable is *"does the optimisation context change
the result?"*. **I designed a clean experiment for the wrong variable, and then believed its answer.**
Hypothesis 3 was not wrong about the mechanism (`/fp:fast` contraction); it was wrong about the test.

**The experiment now added** isolates exactly that variable: the same carve expression, in the same
translation unit, once `FORCEINLINE` and once `FORCENOINLINE`.

- **inlined != FORCENOINLINE** ⇒ FP contraction confirmed. **The port has no bug** — the operator
  stack is arithmetically correct and the residue is unavoidable wherever an op is a virtual call.
  Then: correct the docs with the *real* reason, accept the ULP floor, move on to step 3.
- **inlined == FORCENOINLINE** ⇒ contraction is not it, and there is a real logic bug in
  `FSdfCarveOp` that has now survived four readings.

**UNVERIFIED:** the experiment.

**Next single action:** rebuild, read `INLINING EXPERIMENT`. Either way the answer is final — the
inputs are proven bit-identical, so only the evaluation can differ.

---

## 2026-07-27 — the variable is COMPILE-TIME CONSTANT vs RUNTIME DATA. One line left to confirm.

**The inlining experiment partitioned the measurements perfectly, just not the way it was framed:**

```
inlined carve  !=  FORCENOINLINE carve : 0          <-- inlining is NOT the variable
FORCENOINLINE  ==  operator stack      : 5000/5000  <-- test-TU carve == other-TU op, ALWAYS
inlined        ==  verbatim            : 4874/5000  <-- 126 differ, IN THE SAME TU
```

The test-TU carve matches the operator stack **in a different TU** perfectly, yet disagrees with the
verbatim **in its own TU**. So neither the TU boundary nor inlining is the variable. Sorting the five
implementations by the one remaining difference:

| Implementation | `Blend` is | Group |
|---|---|---|
| `GetMazeDensity` (A) | `const float Blend = 2.0f` | **compile-time constant** |
| `MazeCoreVerbatim` (C) | `const float Blend = 2.0f` | **compile-time constant** |
| `FSdfCarveOp` (B) | a class member | **runtime data** |
| `CarveInlined` | a parameter | **runtime data** |
| `CarveNoInline` | a parameter | **runtime data** |

A == C. B == CarveInlined == CarveNoInline. The two groups differ. **Every single observation from
today fits that split, and nothing else does.**

**Mechanism:** under `/fp:fast`, folding `Blend * 2.0f` to the literal `4.0f` at compile time enables
a contraction in `SmoothStep01`'s `3.0f - 2.0f*x` — one rounding instead of two — that the runtime
form cannot get. ~1 ULP.

**Why this matters far beyond the bug:** an operator's parameters are **data by design** — that is
the entire point of the refactor. They can never go back to being compile-time literals. So this
ULP-level difference is **inherent and permanent** for every archetype port, and no amount of care in
transcription will remove it. That is the real, precise reason bit-identity is unachievable here —
not the vague `/fp:fast` hand-wave I put in the docs earlier, which happened to name the right
compiler flag for the wrong reason.

**Confirming line added:** `CarveConstBlend` — identical to `CarveInlined` except `Blend` is a
compile-time constant. Predicted: matches the verbatim 5000/5000, differs from the runtime form on
exactly 126.

**UNVERIFIED:** that prediction.

**Next single action:** rebuild, read `CARVE VARIABLE ISOLATION`. If it lands as predicted: correct
`OPSTACK-PLAN §2.6`, `AUDIT §C9` and the test's INFO text with the real reason, delete the diagnostic
scaffolding, and **resume Phase 1 step 3** — the port is proven correct (SDF exact on 126/126, only
the final rounding differs, 0 isosurface crossings).

---

## 2026-07-27 — hypothesis 5 dead too. One unambiguous check left, then I stop chasing.

```
CONST-Blend   ==  verbatim      : 4874 / 5000
CONST-Blend   !=  runtime-Blend : 0
```

`Blend`'s constness is **not** the variable: the const and runtime carve forms are bit-identical to
each other, and both miss the verbatim on the same 126. Five hypotheses, five dead.

**Worse, one of the numbers I reasoned from was circular.** `FORCENOINLINE == operator stack :
5000/5000` cannot fail by construction — it feeds `S.Sdf` to a carve and compares against the density
the stack computed *from that same `S.Sdf`*. It measures nothing. I read it as corroboration.

The two carve bodies have now been dumped from the file and diffed: **character-identical, same
translation unit.** So of the three things I keep calling identical — expression, TU, input — one is
false, and the counters cannot say which, because the SDF comparison only ran *inside* the mismatch
branch.

**The unambiguous check added:** feed my carve the SDF the verbatim reports using, compare to the
verbatim's own output, and count `S.Sdf != VerbSdf` **directly, with no enclosing condition**.

- `Recon == Ver` everywhere **and** SDFs equal everywhere ⇒ same function, same input, different
  output ⇒ the difference is a measurement artefact, not a code one.
- SDFs differ ⇒ they were never equal outside the mismatch set, the earlier counter was misleading,
  and the fault is back in the lattice after all.

### Proportion check — this is the last build I would spend on it

**The port is already verified on every axis that affects the game:** SDF bit-exact on 126/126, the
lattice/hashes/`Capsule` exactly right, **0 isosurface crossings out of 20000**, geometry identical,
window-invariant across threads, and every box verdict survives brute force. The open question is why
the *final rounding* differs by 1-2 ULP — and no decision anywhere in this project turns on the
answer.

**So: if this check doesn't resolve it, accept and move to Phase 1 step 3.** An unexplained
deterministic difference deserves real effort — it is a real bug often enough to be worth six builds —
but not unbounded effort when every consequence of it is already measured and benign.

**UNVERIFIED:** the check.

**Next single action:** rebuild, read `UNAMBIGUOUS DISCRIMINATOR`. Then either fix or accept, and in
both cases correct `OPSTACK-PLAN §2.6` / `AUDIT §C9` / the test's INFO text, strip the diagnostic
scaffolding, and resume step 3.

---

## 2026-07-27 — ULP residue PARKED by decision. Phase 1 closed. Moving to step 3.

**Jahni's call, and the right one:** pin it and move on. Six builds spent; the information stopped
being worth the cost.

**The final run did close it as far as it can be closed:**

```
my carve(verbatim's own SDF) == verbatim : 4874 / 5000
stack SDF  !=  verbatim SDF              : 0      (counted directly, no condition)
```

SDFs identical **everywhere**, not just among mismatches. Two character-identical carve
implementations, in the **same translation unit**, fed a **provably identical** input, differ by
1 ULP on 126/5000. For deterministic code that is only possible if they compile to different
instruction sequences — which is exactly what `/fp:fast` permits based on surrounding context, with
no single isolable axis. **Hypothesis 3 was right about the mechanism and wrong about every clean
variable I proposed for it**, which is why four carefully-designed isolation tests all came back
negative.

The one experiment that would settle it (`FPSemantics = Precise` on this module) is blocked behind
the shared-PCH / IWYU debt. Worth clearing on its own terms; not worth clearing to chase 1 ULP.

**Recorded as `AUDIT-2026-07.md §C10`** with the full refutation table, so the next context cannot
re-derive the same five hypotheses at a build each. `OPSTACK-PLAN §2.6` and `§C9` corrected — my
earlier `/fp:fast`-across-TUs explanation was wrong and is gone.

**Scaffolding stripped** from `MazeEquivalence`: the verbatim copy, the three-way, the bisect, the
inlining/constness experiments and the worst-point dump are all out. What remains is the permanent
value: the equivalence check with ULP grading, the window-invariance check, and the box-verdict
brute force.

### Phase 1 is closed. What it proved

- Maze decomposes into **seven** ops with no contortion; three are already shared with other archetypes.
- The **SDF is bit-exact** — lattice, hashes, `Capsule` all correct.
- **Zero isosurface crossings** — geometrically identical to the original.
- **Window-invariant** across query order and worker threads.
- **Every box verdict survives brute force**, and **23 of 60 tiles prove uniform** where
  `ClassifyTile` proves zero for any cave archetype. That is the perf case, measured.

**Next single action:** Phase 1 step 3 — wire the stack into `GetDensityAt` behind a per-strate
opt-in, so a Maze strate can be A/B-switched in the editor and judged on a screenshot (§2.6's bar).

---

## 2026-07-27 — Phase 1 step 3: the stack is WIRED IN, behind a per-strate opt-in.

**`OPSTACK-PLAN §4` Phase 1 step 3 done.** `GetDensityAt` gains exactly one branch, as the plan
specified, and both systems now coexist.

**Files:**
- `VoxelStrateDefinition.h` — `bool bUseOperatorStack` (EditAnywhere, "Use Operator Stack
  (experimental)"). The A/B switch §2.6's acceptance bar needs: flip it, regenerate, judge the
  screenshot.
- `VoxelStrateManager.{h,cpp}` — `UsesOperatorStackForChunk()`. **The ported-archetype list lives
  here and nowhere else**, so an unported archetype ignores the flag and falls back to the switch.
  Ticking the box on any strate is therefore harmless today; only `Maze` changes behaviour.
- `VoxelGenerator.cpp` — `CP_OpStack` / `CP_UseOpStack` built in the SAME refetch block as the
  params (so the chunk+`LayoutVersion` key already covers it, no new invalidation logic), plus one
  `if (CP_UseOpStack)` on the dispatch.

**Cost on the hot path: one bool test per voxel.** The stack is built per chunk, never per voxel —
the same cadence as the existing param refetch. `ApplyDisturbances` and the diff layer are
deliberately left OUTSIDE the stack and run once for both paths, exactly as before, so the tail of
the pipeline is untouched.

**Defensive choice worth noting:** if `UsesOperatorStackForChunk` ever returns true for an archetype
with no builder, the code clears the flag and falls back to the switch rather than generating an
empty stack. A world that is *unported* is recoverable; a world that is *wrong* is not.

**UNVERIFIED:** not compiled. Likely error spots: the `else switch` form in `GetDensityAt`,
`FVoxelOpStack` as a `thread_local` (it is move-only — move-assign from a temporary is used to
reset it), and the new include in `VoxelGenerator.cpp`.

**What to look at in the editor:** set a Maze strate's `bUseOperatorStack`, regenerate, and compare
against the same seed with it off. **Pass = recognisably the same maze** — same corridor scale, same
connectivity, same feel. That is §2.6's bar, and it is the last thing Phase 1 needs.

**Next single action:** build, then the visual A/B. After that, Phase 2 — the port order in
`OPSTACK-DECOMPOSITION §10.4` starts with FlatPlain + CrystalChamber collapsing into one op.

---

## 2026-07-27 — session handoff written. 39 UE skills installed.

**`OPSTACK-HANDOFF.md`** added at the plugin root: a pasteable resume prompt for a fresh session.
Read order, exact current state, the immediate next action, the hard rules, the open items, and the
method lesson from this session.

**39 Unreal skills installed.** Jahni dropped a UE skills library into `.claude/skills/`, but nested
as `.claude/skills/core/<name>/SKILL.md` — two levels deep, where Claude Code discovers skills one
level deep at `.claude/skills/<name>/SKILL.md`. None were being loaded. Flattened (39 SKILL.md, 124
reference files, all frontmatter valid, folder names already matched `name:`); `core/category.md`
left in place as documentation. Confirmed loading.

⚠️ **They are untracked**: `.gitignore` starts with `*`, and git cannot re-include a file whose parent
directory is excluded, so nothing under `.claude/` can be tracked without un-ignoring the directory
itself. Same shape as AUDIT P1. Flagged to Jahni, not actioned — vendoring a reference library into
the plugin repo is his call.

**Immediately relevant to open work:** `module-and-build-system` documents `PCHUsage` / shared PCH /
IWYU — i.e. the exact mechanism that blocked §C10's settling experiment. That skill was in the repo,
undiscovered, while it was worked out the slow way. Worth reading before clearing the IWYU debt.

**Next single action unchanged:** build Phase 1 step 3, then the visual A/B on a Maze strate.

---

## 2026-07-27 — fresh context: two gaps closed in the step-3 wiring BEFORE the build.

Resumed from `OPSTACK-HANDOFF.md`. Read the step-3 diff against the test path instead of taking
"not compiled" as "nothing to check first" — the symbols all line up (`BuildMazeStack`'s five params
match, `Seed`/`OriginSpineRadius` are generator members, `FVoxelOpContext` comes in transitively via
`VoxelDensityOp.h`), but **the production path and the test path did not agree on two things.**

**1. `PrepareChunk` was never called in production.** The test calls it (`…MazeTest.cpp:133`);
`GetDensityAt` did not. All seven concrete `PrepareChunk` bodies are empty today, so this changes
**nothing** now — which is exactly why it was worth fixing before it could bite. The first op that
hoists real per-chunk work would have been **green in test and silently wrong in game**, and that
class of bug is expensive to find precisely because the test says yes. `GetDensityAt` now builds an
`FVoxelOpContext` (chunk, seed, layout version, strate Z bounds) in the same refetch block and calls
`PrepareChunk` on it. `Step` stays 1 — `GetDensityAt` genuinely does not know the mesher's sampling
step (T2.b contract); noted rather than guessed.

**2. The degenerate-strate early-out had no counterpart.** `GetMazeDensity` opens with
`if (StrateHeight <= 0.0f) return 1.0f;` — air. The stack has no such early-out **by design** (the
test asserts this and refuses to run on a degenerate strate). Unguarded, a zero-height Maze strate
would give **air on one path and whatever the spine/seal ops make of a zero-height band on the
other**. `GetDensityAt` now falls back to the `switch` in that case, so the reference behaviour is
the behaviour. Reachability is not the point — the archetype guard exists, so its port needs one.

**Docs corrected, since both were now actively false:**
- `VoxelDensityOpStack.h`'s banner still said "NOTHING HERE FEEDS THE GAME". It does feed the game
  now, behind the opt-in. Rewritten to say exactly what is wired (`GetDensityAt`) and what is not
  (`ClassifyTile` — still hand-written guards, that is Phase 2), plus the §C10 "never compare the
  two paths" rule at the point of use.
- `CODEMAP §3.2d` had the same stale claim; `§3` gained rows for `UsesOperatorStackForChunk` and
  `bUseOperatorStack`, and the `BuildMazeStack` row now carries the degenerate-strate precondition.

**UNVERIFIED:** still not compiled — that is Jahni's call and it is the immediate next action.
Error spots unchanged, plus one: `FVoxelOpContext` is aggregate-initialised field-by-field, so a
field rename would show up here.

**Next single action unchanged:** build, then the visual A/B on a Maze strate (§2.6's bar —
recognisably the same maze, judged on a screenshot). Then Phase 2, starting with the §3.1 question.

---

## 2026-07-27 — PHASE 1 CLOSED (visual A/B passed). Phase 2 opened: the slab collapse.

**Phase 1's acceptance bar is met.** Jahni built step 3, ticked `bUseOperatorStack` on the Maze
strate and compared: *"it's hard to see with our current maze (which is simple in architecture) but
seems like it's pretty similar, if not entirely similar."* That is §2.6's bar — recognisably the
same maze — and it is worth being precise about how much weight it carries.

**The screenshot is the weakest evidence Phase 1 has, and that is fine, because it was never
carrying the argument.** A simple maze is a poor visual discriminator: "hard to tell apart" is
*exactly* what the measurements already predicted, since **0 of 20 000 samples cross the
isosurface** — no triangle can move. The A/B's job was to catch the class of error the numbers
cannot see (wrong params reaching the stack, wrong strate, wrong wiring), and it did that. The
geometric claim rests on the numbers, and always did.

### Phase 2, first port: FlatPlain + CrystalChamber → ONE op

**§3.1 answered by Jahni: the Z term can go.** So it is gone, and this is the change that makes the
rest worth doing.

**Two separate changes landed together, deliberately, and the test is what keeps them attributable:**

1. **The design change** — `GetSlabDensity`'s floor and ceiling noise lost their Z terms
   (`WorldZ * FF * 0.05f` → `0.0f`; `WorldZ * CF * 0.08f + 3000.0f` → `3000.0f`, keeping the
   decorrelation offset). The world **re-tunes once**: a different slice of the noise field means a
   different floor/ceiling shape. Not a degradation — a different draw.
2. **The refactor** — the now-XY-pure function ported to `FSlabVoidSource` + `FGridColumnMod`,
   plus the three structural ops. Five ops.

`SlabEquivalence` compares the stack against `GetSlabDensity` **as it is now**, so: green ⇒ the port
is a pure refactor ⇒ **any visual delta is attributable to the Z-term removal and nothing else.**
That is why both could go in one build without losing the ability to say which one caused what —
the attribution comes from the test, not from the build order.

**Why this port matters more than its size:** `BuildSlabStack` has **no branch on archetype**,
because `GetSlabDensity` never had one either — CrystalChamber IS FlatPlain with a bigger
`CeilingRoughness`. The test runs the identical battery on both slots, so "two archetypes are one
op" is demonstrated rather than asserted. **8 archetypes → 7.**

**And the perf claim, which is what §3.1 was really about:** `FSlabVoidSource::ClassifyBox` is
**exact and needs no sampling**. `VoxelNoise::FBM` is contractually `[-1,1]`, so both surfaces live
in Z bands with known bounds — a tile below `FloorZ - FloorAmp` is provably solid, a tile strictly
between the bands is provably air. A slab strate is mostly solid rock below its floor, so this
should prove a large fraction of tiles. `ClassifyTile` proves **zero** today. The test prints the
count per archetype; that number is the whole return on the Z term.

`FGridColumnMod` returning `Identity` when no column reaches the box is what lets the source's
`AllAir` survive the fold — otherwise columns would kill every air verdict in the strate.

**UNVERIFIED: none of this is compiled.** Likely error spots, in order:
- `VoxelForgeOpStackSlabTest.cpp` is new — check it is picked up by the module's build.
- The lambda `RunForSlot` captures `World`/`Gen` by reference and calls `AddError`/`TestEqual` on
  the test instance; `TestEqual`'s name argument is built with `*FString::Printf(...)`.
- `FGridColumnMod::GetCells` returns a reference to a `thread_local` — intentional (same pattern as
  `FLatticeCorridorSource::GetCellEdges`), but it is `const` while mutating the thread_local.
- `static constexpr float ColBlend` used inside `FMath::Max`/comparisons — may need a definition
  under older MSVC ODR rules if it is ever odr-used.
- `FSlabGenerationParams` must be complete in `VoxelDensityOpStack.h` (it comes via
  `VoxelStrateTypes.h`, already included).

**Next single action:** build, run `VoxelForge.OpStack.SlabEquivalence`, and **read the two
"proved uniform" numbers** — they are the measured payoff of §3.1. Then tick `bUseOperatorStack` on
a FlatPlain or CrystalChamber strate for the visual A/B. Expect the floor/ceiling shape to have
changed from the Z-term removal; the question is whether it still reads as the same *kind* of place.

---

## 2026-07-27 — SlabEquivalence GREEN. The §3.1 payoff is measured: 36 and 40 of 60 tiles.

```
FlatPlain      box verdicts over 60 tiles: 36 proved uniform, 24 Mixed
CrystalChamber box verdicts over 60 tiles: 40 proved uniform, 20 Mixed
both: 52 of 20000 samples differ, ALL at ULP scale, 0 cross the isosurface
```

**This is the number the whole §3.1 question was about, and it is better than Maze's.** Maze proved
23 of 60; the slab archetypes prove **36 and 40** — 60-67 % of tiles, where `ClassifyTile` proves
**zero** for these two today. The reason is structural rather than lucky: a slab strate is mostly
solid rock below its floor, and now that both surfaces are XY-pure their Z bands are known exactly,
so "this tile is entirely below the floor band" is a comparison rather than a sample.

**The ULP residue is the known C10 floor** — 52/20000, 0 isosurface crossings, worst delta 2⁻¹⁸
(exactly 1 ULP at a density magnitude of ~32). **Not investigated, on purpose.** Same shape as C10:
deterministic, ULP-scale, zero consequence, and six builds were already spent proving that shape is
not worth chasing.

### The output exposed a real weakness in my own test — fixed

Both archetypes reported **the same 52 and the same worst delta**. The explanation is in the
fixture: `FTestWorld::Build` sets only `GeneratorType`, so **FlatPlain and CrystalChamber both get
DEFAULT `FSlabGenerationParams`.** They are the same configuration at two depths.

So the test's claim #2 was overstated. It demonstrated "the slab stack works at two depths", not
"one op serves two archetypes with different defaults" — **`CeilingRoughness`, the one field that
actually distinguishes CrystalChamber, was never varied.** The differing tile counts (36 vs 40)
come from the two slots' Z ranges, not from the archetypes differing.

**A third pass added: `CrystalChamber(tuned)`** — `CeilingRoughness` 6 → 20, plus a rougher floor
and 3× the columns. It varies what actually matters, and it is deliberately the **worst case for
`ClassifyBox`**: a large `CeilingRoughness` widens the ceiling band and makes the
`Max(CeilZ - noise, FloorSurface + 2)` clamp far more likely to bind, which is exactly where a
false verdict — a HOLE — would appear. The default params were too gentle to stress that bound.

**UNVERIFIED:** the third pass. Its box-verdict brute force is the part that matters; expect fewer
tiles proved uniform than the gentle passes (wider bands ⇒ more Mixed), and **zero** unsound
verdicts. If `NumUnsound > 0` here, the `CeilHi` bound in `FSlabVoidSource::ClassifyBox` is the
first suspect, not the noise contract.

**Next single action:** rebuild, confirm the tuned pass is green, then the visual A/B on a FlatPlain
or CrystalChamber strate. The floor/ceiling shape WILL differ from before (the Z-term removal); the
question is whether it still reads as the same kind of place. Then `SurfaceWorld`
(OPSTACK-DECOMPOSITION §5) — biggest payoff, most care.

---

## 2026-07-27 — the tuned pass cried wolf. The TEST was wrong, not the port.

```
CrystalChamber(tuned): 121/20000 differ, 6 exceed the bound, worst |delta| 1.71661377e-05
                       0 cross the isosurface;  box verdicts 32/60 proved, 0 unsound
```

**The port is fine. The yardstick was wrong, and it was wrong in a way that only shows up under
large amplitudes — which is precisely why the tuned pass was worth adding.**

The old bound was `16 · max(|Old|, 1) · FLT_EPSILON` — ULPs measured on the **output density**.
But the density is `min(Z - Floor, Ceil - Z)`, so **near the isosurface the output tends to 0 while
the intermediates (surfaces, world Z, noise amplitudes) are in the HUNDREDS.** A rounding born at
scale ~400 was being judged against a yardstick of scale 1: 400× too tight, and tightest exactly
where the test looks hardest.

**Measured, not assumed:**

| | roughness | worst \|delta\| | in ULP of \|Z\| |
|---|---|---|---|
| gentle passes | ceil 6, floor 4 | 3.81e-06 | ~0.08 |
| tuned pass | ceil 20, floor 9 | 1.72e-05 | **0.345** |

Amplitudes went up ×2.25–3.33, the deltas went up **×4.5**, and the worst one is **sub-ULP at the
scale it is born in**. Error proportional to amplitude is the signature of ordinary rounding, not of
a wrong transcription — a wrong offset or a missing `abs()` would move the surface by **voxels**,
four orders of magnitude above this, not by a factor of four.

**Fixed:** the bound now scales with the magnitude the error is born in (`max(|Old|, |Z|, strate Z
bounds)`), and — more importantly — **the warning now prints the discriminator instead of just the
alarm**: the density at the offending sample and the delta expressed in ULPs of the working scale.
A few ULP with a near-zero density is cancellation; thousands of ULP is drift. The next context
reads that off the message instead of re-deriving it at a build apiece.

The test stays discriminating: real drift is 4 orders of magnitude above the new bound.

### The box verdicts held under the worst case — that is the result that mattered

32 of 60 proved uniform with **0 unsound**, under tripled ceiling roughness and 3× the columns.
That was the specific thing the tuned pass existed to attack (a wide ceiling band makes the
`Max(CeilZ - noise, FloorSurface + 2)` clamp bind, which is where a false verdict would be a HOLE),
and the bound survived it. Fewer tiles proved than the gentle passes (32 vs 36/40), which is correct
— wider bands mean more genuinely Mixed tiles.

### Visual A/B — and a content finding worth more than the A/B

Jahni: *"visually, crystal and plain are identical, same for when opting on or off from the
opstack."*

**Opt-in on/off identical = the port is confirmed a pure refactor.** Note this is the expected
result and my earlier framing was sloppy: **both** paths compute the post-§3.1 function, so the
Z-term change is invisible in the A/B by construction. It is only visible against the world as it
looked *before* this build.

**FlatPlain and CrystalChamber rendering identical is the real finding.** They share
`FSlabGenerationParams` and nothing in the content distinguishes them — **the enum promised a
difference the data never delivered**, in the shipped world exactly as in the test fixture. So the
merge loses no distinction; it reveals there was none. Recorded in `OPSTACK-DECOMPOSITION §3`.
Making a crystal chamber look like one is now a **params** job (`CeilingRoughness` 6 → ~20), which
is precisely the outcome the refactor is for.

**UNVERIFIED:** the corrected bound and the new warning text.

**Next single action:** rebuild; the tuned pass should drop to INFO with all three passes reporting
sub-ULP-of-scale deltas. Then `SurfaceWorld` (§5) — biggest payoff, most care: the T1.a column cache
and the exact-lattice `ClassifyTile` bound must both survive the port.

---