The corpus was starved: the loader followed the active settings pool and
found ONE vector, so all 64 candidates were bit-identical and every number
was a placeholder. It now loads every UVoxelStrateDefinition via the Asset
Registry (Saved/Autosaves and Saved/Cooked excluded -- including them would
silently weight the corpus toward whatever was autosaved last) plus the
per-archetype defaults from VoxelStrateTypes.h, which are themselves
hand-tuned known-good vectors. Blending stays WITHIN an archetype;
different archetypes read different subsets of the 73 fields.
⭐ THE COMPOSER WORKS. 64 candidates blended from real parents, every one
measured:
survival 59/64 (92.2%)
non-vacuous 60 · largest-share >= .50 60 · primordial law 63 · roll
failures 0
and they are genuinely different worlds, not one world 64 times:
air fraction .0137 -> 1.000
walkable .000 -> .389
feature scale 4 -> 376 voxels
archetypes TunnelNetwork, VerticalShafts, FlatPlain, CrystalChamber,
SurfaceWorld, Underwater, FloatingIslands, Maze
⭐⭐ §6.2 IS CLOSED, and it was the real risk. Box-verdict bounds were only
ever proved against the parameters Jahni typed; the whole worry was that
invented parameters would violate a bound nobody had checked -- silently,
leaving no geometry and no collision. Against ROLLED parameters:
1,224 boxes proved (549 AllSolid, 675 AllAir), 1,336 Mixed
1,629,144 voxels brute-forced
0 VIOLATIONS
The bounds hold across the rolled range, not just at authored points. The
isolation work in 8e346a3 is what made that true.
The 5 rejections are a real finding, not noise: FloatingIslands can jitter
its islands out of existence and return an all-air strate (air 1.000,
walkable 0.000, feature scale 0). That is exactly what reject-and-resample
(§3.5) is for -- the measurement caught it without anyone anticipating it,
which is the whole argument for measuring rather than trusting.
Roll+measure 112.6 s for 64 candidates. §3.1's budget is "runs overnight",
so there is room for thousands.
Build clean, 23 succeeded / 0 warnings / 0 failed (the deliberate vacuity
warning is gone because the check is no longer vacuous). Verified by me.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VJiTcTSDNkKBtnNdiBtdaU
Fr0zkaandClaude Opus 5
190ff381c0