VoxelForge

0 Fork 0

Files

T

Fr0zkaandClaude Opus 5.5 b0a14262b1 wip(standalone): GPU step 6 -- near field on GPU, exact; cold start still slower than CPU

Near LOD0/1 (detail band, relief, root refinement, normals) now evaluated and
meshed on the GPU. 960 near tiles: zero sign/topology differences vs CPU and
WARP, vertex max 0.0049 mm (was 15 cm); far survival audit passes; CPU hashes
44/44 unchanged. Far connector-panel outlier (64.56 cm, LOD8) remains a
tessellation difference, and remote captures show missing far geometry on GPU.

Cold readiness (viewer clock, my interleaved runs): CPU 2.51/2.49/2.40 s,
GPU 5.05/2.68/2.80 s. The ~2.1 s Present stall hit only the first GPU launch.
Viewer spends ~1.13 s before shape compile starts (startup checks), which is
the gap between the 0.95 s benchmark and ~2.4 s on-screen.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MmSoF64BbRFmk9C3p1VsBJ

2026-10-06 20:03:10 +02:00

include/VoxelForgeCore

wip(standalone): GPU step 6 -- near field on GPU, exact; cold start still slower than CPU

2026-10-06 20:03:10 +02:00

src

wip(standalone): GPU step 6 -- near field on GPU, exact; cold start still slower than CPU

2026-10-06 20:03:10 +02:00

verification

wip(standalone): GPU step 6 -- near field on GPU, exact; cold start still slower than CPU

2026-10-06 20:03:10 +02:00

API.md

standalone: cheap chunk crossings -- exact-tile slab compile, nearest tiles first (~1.2 s -> 121 ms peak)