Fr0zkaandClaude Opus 5
7b982ad5ae
The composer must assemble stacks nobody wrote by hand. Today the legal order of operators lives in a human's head and in the hand-written builders. COMPOSER-NOTES §3.2: an op's legal position is fixed by which channel it READS and which it WRITES, so dependencies form a DAG and any topological sort of that DAG is a legal stack. EVoxelOpChannel names the two fields FVoxelOpSample actually carries (Density, Sdf) -- read from the struct, not assumed. All 29 concrete density ops declare reads, writes and additive/transformative, filled in by reading each Eval rather than trusting its name. The declarations are PURE VIRTUAL so a new op cannot silently omit them; the composer's safety depends on every op answering. A declaration nobody checks is a comment, so ValidateChannelOrder exists and VoxelForge.OpStack.ChannelDAG runs all eight shipping stacks through it. All pass: TunnelNetwork/Underwater 20 ops, Maze 8, VerticalShafts 9, FloatingIslands 8, FlatPlain/CrystalChamber 6, SurfaceWorld 6. Metadata is snapshotted in FVoxelOpStack::Add, so no declaration virtual is ever called per voxel -- ARCHITECTURE §8.10 respected. ⚠️ THE FUSE WAS DELIBERATELY NOT APPLIED, and the reason is the finding I asked for instead. §3.2 assumed FFloorBiasMod sits next to FCaveRoughnessMod. It does not: TEN ops separate them (Terrace, LayerLine, Ribbing, Overhang, Cliff, Scallop, Arch, RoomColumn, Dome, Pinch), and all ten read and write Density. Moving FloorBias would reorder the live density accumulation, and IEEE-754 addition is not bitwise commutative -- so the note's claim that fusing "leaves the field bit-identical" is false as written. That leaves a real open question for the composer, recorded not resolved: channel rules alone say any Density->Density order is legal, but they cannot express "this op CORRECTS that one". Either the fuse proceeds and accepts a changed field (legitimate -- peer determinism never required bit-identity across builds), or corrective intent needs its own declaration. Settling it needs FFloorBiasMod's actual math read, which is the next question I put to Codex. Build clean, 22 succeeded / 0 failed, verified in VoxelM.log. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VJiTcTSDNkKBtnNdiBtdaU