Fr0zka
85993199fb
SlabEquivalence came back green (FlatPlain 36/60 and CrystalChamber 40/60 tiles proved uniform, vs zero for today's ClassifyTile; 52/20000 ULP-scale diffs, 0 isosurface crossings). But both archetypes reported the SAME 52 and the same worst delta, which pointed at the fixture: FTestWorld::Build sets only GeneratorType, so both slots carry DEFAULT slab params. So the two passes were the same configuration at two depths. The test claimed to demonstrate "one op, two archetypes" while never varying CeilingRoughness — the only field that actually distinguishes CrystalChamber. The differing tile counts come from the slots' Z ranges, not from the archetypes. Third pass added: CrystalChamber(tuned), CeilingRoughness 6 -> 20, rougher floor, 3x the columns. It varies what matters and doubles as the worst case for the ClassifyBox amplitude bounds — a large CeilingRoughness widens the ceiling band and makes the FloorSurface + 2 clamp far more likely to bind, which is precisely where a false verdict would be a hole. The default params were too gentle to stress it. The ULP residue is left alone: deterministic, 0 isosurface crossings, and the same shape C10 already cost six builds to prove not worth chasing. UNVERIFIED: the third pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>