Fr0zkaandClaude Opus 5.5
f8cba7c36a
v9 plan binds the resolved mouths and passes layout, 3/3 interfaces, shell, ripple; the composed FI walk still fails (2 capsule collisions where passage/0-1 and 1-2 tubes carve the island route, 40 unsupported centers, a departure landing with 0/5 support). Owner stays on the compiled-analytic FI path. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016dhxM43dnWvUu2B5Ph1iG1
1.1 KiB
L133 — native floating islands
Stopped after the second route design. The native v9 plan binds the owner’s resolved mouths and passes raw route audit, strict layout (0 issues), 3/3 interface audits, shell (0 floor violations), and ripple (3/3). The candidate dispatches FI natively.
The composed FI walk still fails: 2 capsule collisions, 40 unsupported centers, 0 grade failures; mouth binding passes. The return lane is carved by passage/0-1/0 near (19.755, 9.605, -733.553) m (4.25 m from its 4.5 m tube). At passage/1-2/0, the approach has collisions at (14.402, -10.552, -732.556) m and (14.242, -10.712, -732.556) m; the departure landing probe (19.166, -14.650, -733.331) m gets 0/5 support probes. The exact endpoints alone are not enough to place a route clear of both composed passage volumes and retain a supported landing.
No captures, timing matrix, compiler determinism matrix, baseline update, or UE host build were run after the required composed walk gate failed. The owner’s default import remains on its legacy FI fallback. Logs and candidate fixtures are under Saved/Linux/l133/.